bjoernvold.com

Yeah, I noticed that...
Got the Fedora 23 dvd but I don't think it's going to make it either,,, however I am going to try to give it an actual install. One never knows.

Update, seems even Fedora has some work to do on it. I ran it live rather than install... no love, no option to add a wireless connection.


ndiswrapper is not found, and it kept telling me that I didn't have permissions to install the board.bin and firmware-5.bin (of course, as it can't install to a dvd...)

viking60 wrote:It looks like installing kernel 3.19 and then dkms makes it magically work on Ubuntu - while it is not working with kernel 4.1.

I believe that dkms is installed. ndiswrapper, I think, is not working right in Mageia 5.

I'm going to double-check on dkms, and see if I can go from there.

We're getting closer. I should've made a b-line for the Mageia bugzilla to begin with.

https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16915

Looks like you are getting closer to a solution. It is only a matter of time before your driver is in ath10k.

Yep, and I can't wait. Thomas Backlund was very straightforward, did not confuse me. At least we got it to where the Linux driver is recognised, and I don't have to put up with ndiswrapper's shit any more (which it gives one a lot of, and is one of my complaints with Mageia, that they've carried over Mandrake and Mandriva bugs to it). doktor5000 I came to find out filed a bug back in the Mandrake days of ndiswrapper forgetting to load to create the interface to install a driver. It's certainly not doing its job now, so Thomas put me on a different path with it. I still have issues with drakconnect; see the last attachment (the screenshot) that I put up at the bug. However, this time I am a step closer because I get the option of either installing via ndiswrapper OR using the Linux driver in drakconnect. Before, I only had option to use ndiswrapper, which was an epic fail no matter what I did (still is an interface error on it, but not the ndiswrapper one).

It's done! It's done! It's done!





I'll let you refer to the Mageia bug report for the details, but for now I'm going to mark this solved and smile for weeks (since I haven't in weeks from this)!!! Now I know what to do for it, and away I go with Arch!

Er, probably Manjaro first.

I'm keeping the Mageia installation. I didn't go through all this today on it for nothing.

Triple boot time!

Er, Fedora first then Manjaro, then Arch.

Or,,, Haiku, then Fedora, then Manjaro, then Arch.







...I think I best get Vbox going...

Yes that bug explains it well.

Copying the latest ath10k driver to your box and use that seems to have fixed it.

Good news that is.. for all the padawans following (with that hardware) since this will be the default driver in future updates.

Um, I spoke too soon.

Now when I go to create the connection, it sees it as unlisted and I have to put it in manually. When I do, it gives me no option for WPA2-PSK [AES]. It only gives me option for WPA/WPA2 Enterprise for WPA.
I also get "Network Manager is not currently running..." on boot, and it stays through login to the desktop.

So, I try with it, and of course the connection test fails...

Update: I'm going to go ahead and install Fedora 23 to the third part of the hdd now, and go through the process I went through at the bug to get it going with the wireless, see if it works there after.

This does not seem to be a driver issue but a setup thing.
You need to enter your encryption key in the connection probably under WPA2-PSK [AES].

You can set or find that key on the router control panel.

viking60 wrote:This does not seem to be a driver issue but a setup thing.
You need to enter your encryption key in the connection probably under WPA2-PSK [AES].

You can set or find that key on the router control panel.

That's just the problem though. I don't have WPA2-PSK [AES] as an option to use. I only have WPA/WPA2 Enterprise, which my connection isn't.

Can it be used anyway, or ?