bjoernvold.com

The name “Moondrake” and the domain are owned by Mandriva SA. I did not know that Moondrake was owned by Mandriva SA. And it does not compute with: Per Øyvind has violated the agreements and decisions that OMA made using legitimate democratic procedures thus breaking the core principles of a commun...

We all are the Community! Uncategorized by Kate Lebedeff We all are the Community! Short story. Facts and statement. OpenMandriva Association (OMA) was founded by community members to continue development of desktop Mandriva Linux, which Mandriva S.A. company could not develop anymore due to their ...

The best thing for Mandriva would be that all hands worked on the distro - My opinion. The best thing for Mandriva is that provind is not working on Mandriva and basically shuts up - your opinion - shared by the association. The association, as a body and as what I've seen of its leaders is not so ...

Yeah, exactly, and the rebranding work really needs to be done ASAP, especially since Charles is pretty much giving me a takedown notice of any new release which it hasn't been done for already... Ah even rolf might accept that (But if you act like Louis 16 then I am pretty sure that he still is ha...

It is not "spot on". Nowhere do I say I am entitled to more than my opinion. You continue to mischaracterize me as a despot, as you don't have a logical rebuttal. I know, Per works a lot, which is his choice, and for which he's been paid. I only say, in my OPINION, he's the one who burned ...

I am forgetting nothing of the sort. What you seem to forget is that I've been following cooker since 2000 and OMA mailing list for the last year, since it started. I've simply come to the conclusion that Per is standing in the way of the remnants of the community that are attempting to build a new ...

Hi, (I don't have the time to register a new address on the mailists, but I want to speak as member of the Open Source Community, not as a Mandriva employee) I totally agree with Per Oyvind point of view. It is _huge_ mistake to believe that Mandriva company can take a decision for Mandriva communi...

dedanna1029 wrote:Yes, of which as said above, is not found in repos or anywhere, right off the bat in the very first code line, and in the title of the thread. Answer the question. If you can't, I'll wait for Jim.

Maybe read what I wrote, for a change. chrootkit is different from chkrootkit

For the simple matter of the package, I think you're looking for :A [rolf@localhost ~]$ urpmq -i chkrootkit Name : chkrootkit Version : 0.49 Release : 5 Group : Monitoring Size : 4705908 Architecture: x86_64 Source RPM : chkrootkit-0.49-5.src.rpm URL : http://www.chkrootkit.org/ Summary : Check root...

and the winning name was: Mandala Linux "with large majorities The first poll round's result might get rejected since they didn't even bother to check the associations with the proposed names and "Mandala Linux" reads quite amusing in Russian slang thus a bunch of Russian folks just ...

It is only necessary because of the artwork/branding and the name -right? No. Why do I have to keep saying the same thing? The OMA was formed in compliance with French law in order to receive license and assistance from Mandriva SA. From the last of my posts, which you quoted without reading fully,...

I'd use two separate urpmq switches for package information and dependencies. If you combine them, it gets quite lengthy :) [rolf@localhost ~]$ urpmq -i urpmi Name : urpmi Version : 6.71 Release : 8 Group : System/Configuration/Packaging Size : 3554833 Architecture: noarch Source RPM : urpmi-6.71-8....