Arch Linux

[dedanna1029]

Yeah, installed the outdated amazonmp3 package in yaourt, but it won't start.

Also, it's now Saturday... procrastination is the key lately with this kid. LOL.

Edit: But I did figure out what's wrong with amazonmp3 -

Code: Select all

 amazonmp3
/opt/amazonmp3/amazonmp3: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.0.9.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Can't use gtkpacman right now to find it with; tried pacman -S libssl, and it came up:

Code: Select all

# pacman -S libssl
error: 'libssl': could not find or read package

I'm imagining even if it did have it, it would be a much newer version than the one amazonmp3 wants.

[viking60]

I wish you could do something main stream only once. No wonder you have strange behavior in your system, you do not do anything by the book.
And you leave fubared programs only to fubar some more. I think you should remove that Amazone stuff and wait until a new version is out.
You are never going to do it, but I thought I should say it anyway
That file is not in any repo.

[dedanna1029]

Yeah, it's not working anyway. Will check for it later. But, I got it from yaourt (as shown in the code), so was close to MSM. LOL. I really need that for amazon's mp3s - wish they'd hurry up and update it.

[viking60]

That file is probably a dynamic php extension or something.

[dedanna1029]

The libssl one?

Actually, yaourt does have it, but it can't build it; I'm assuming because it's out of date:

Code: Select all

 yaourt libssl
-->1 aur/lib32-openssl-compatibility 0.9.8-1 (Out of Date) (142)
    libssl and libcrypto 0.9.8 libs (32 Bit)
2 aur/openssl-compatibility 0.9.8-3 (322)
    libssl and libcrypto 0.9.8 libs

It said something about it needing an option to build for i686 - that it was only for 64-bit when it was trying.

[viking60]

Is it not all pulled when installing openssl?
Have you installed: perl-crypt-ssleay

[dedanna1029]

There isn't a specific "libssl" package - that one is the one that came up containing it anyway. I'll redo the attempt to install it and show you what it's doing - but again, it's outdated anyway.

Code: Select all

 yaourt libssl
1 aur/lib32-openssl-compatibility 0.9.8-1 (Out of Date) (142)
    libssl and libcrypto 0.9.8 libs (32 Bit)
2 aur/openssl-compatibility 0.9.8-3 (322)
    libssl and libcrypto 0.9.8 libs
==> Enter n° (separated by blanks, or a range) of packages to be installed
==> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
==> 1


==> Downloading lib32-openssl-compatibility PKGBUILD from AUR...
bsdtar: Removing leading '/' from member names
x PKGBUILD


Comment by: romen on Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:45:51 +0000
It is using openssl 0.9.8n instead of 0.9.8o   

Comment by: nofxx on Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:22:38 +0000
Shouldn`t the install path be /usr/lib32 instead of /opt/lib32/usr/lib?
Got eagle working that way.   

First Submitted: Wed, 05 May 2010 15:04:12 +0000   
lib32-openssl-compatibility 0.9.8-1 : libssl and libcrypto 0.9.8 libs (32 Bit)
( Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous ! )
==> Edit PKGBUILD ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort)
==> ------------------------------------
==> n

==> lib32-openssl-compatibility dependencies:


==> Continue building lib32-openssl-compatibility ? [Y/n]
==> -----------------------------------------------------
==>
==> Building and installing package
--------->==> ERROR:  is not available for the 'i686' architecture.
--------->Note that many packages may need a line added to their PKGBUILD
    such as arch=('i686').
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build lib32-openssl-compatibility.
==> Restart building lib32-openssl-compatibility ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------------------------
==> n

On another note, it appears that I have to change that bug for xscreensaver and gnome-screensaver. I've run with both turned off; my screen still blanks (and I have that off, too!), and I still have a heckuva time resuming from it. I'm suspecting it's in X, not the screensavers themselves. Will be scanning .xsession-errors for what's up with it all, too.

[dedanna1029]

WHY, oh WHY, did this thing just update me from KDE 4.5.2-3 to KDE 4.4.7, and call it "updates"???

KDE4.4 is nowhere near the caliber that KDE4.5 is, and with 4.5, I was actually beginning to enjoy KDE from time to time.

[viking60]

Hm the update looked a bit strange but it still is 4.5.2 on the box.

[dedanna1029]

Yeah, that's what it's saying here too in About/KDE from K3B.

Too weird.

[viking60]

Still it is 4.5.2 and fully functioning -so you are happy

[dedanna1029]

Eh, yeah I guess until they update those particular packages back to where they should be version-wise LOL

Am enjoying Gnome more again though. Gnome shell ROCKS