A very light rpm distro comparison
Posted: 10 Sep 2015, 07:24
Mageia took an hour and a half to install.
openSUSE 13.2 (Milestone 2) took less than a half hour.
Mageia is on kernel 3.19, after updates.
openSUSE is on 4.1.6.
Mageia has issues with Qualcomm wireless, openSUSE doesn't.
openSUSE works with UEFI.
Mageia claims to, but doesn't, at least not on this computer..
openSUSE found every OS on this system for grub2, Mageia I had to add Windows to grub2. I still have yet to test if I'll be able to boot into Windows with grub2. I am expecting issues, so I'm not disappointed if I do get them, but I have a slight feeling that I won't.
openSUSE is very fast, as fast as this computer can go.
I noticed Mageia5 was a fair bit slower.
On Mageia, my battery drained in two hours. IMO, no excuse for it when it's a six-hour battery. It could possibly be whatever kept it bogged down.
I do not lack for packages, but one on openSUSE, that being an old unmaintained one called grip.
It was much easier to set up in openSUSE, and faster.
I'm installing extra packages now.
Last night with Mageia, I couldn't even start that until 2:30 am. It's just past midnight now - 00:21, and it's almost done installing them.
The only thing I can think is Mageia does not have the bazillion contributors that openSUSE has, therefore it takes longer to catch up to things. The running slowly, I'd have no clue. There is nothing openSUSE isn't finding on boot, Mageia couldn't even load the legacy module on boot... It depresses me to see this. Mageia has been a good distro up until now for me - but then the last I ran was Mageia 3 before Mageia 5 crept in. The only thing openSUSE is behind on is they are still on KDE4. That's OK. I like it better.
openSUSE 13.2 (Milestone 2) took less than a half hour.
Mageia is on kernel 3.19, after updates.
openSUSE is on 4.1.6.
Mageia has issues with Qualcomm wireless, openSUSE doesn't.
openSUSE works with UEFI.
Mageia claims to, but doesn't, at least not on this computer..
openSUSE found every OS on this system for grub2, Mageia I had to add Windows to grub2. I still have yet to test if I'll be able to boot into Windows with grub2. I am expecting issues, so I'm not disappointed if I do get them, but I have a slight feeling that I won't.
openSUSE is very fast, as fast as this computer can go.
I noticed Mageia5 was a fair bit slower.
On Mageia, my battery drained in two hours. IMO, no excuse for it when it's a six-hour battery. It could possibly be whatever kept it bogged down.
I do not lack for packages, but one on openSUSE, that being an old unmaintained one called grip.
It was much easier to set up in openSUSE, and faster.
I'm installing extra packages now.
Last night with Mageia, I couldn't even start that until 2:30 am. It's just past midnight now - 00:21, and it's almost done installing them.
The only thing I can think is Mageia does not have the bazillion contributors that openSUSE has, therefore it takes longer to catch up to things. The running slowly, I'd have no clue. There is nothing openSUSE isn't finding on boot, Mageia couldn't even load the legacy module on boot... It depresses me to see this. Mageia has been a good distro up until now for me - but then the last I ran was Mageia 3 before Mageia 5 crept in. The only thing openSUSE is behind on is they are still on KDE4. That's OK. I like it better.

