Arch Linux

You like a certain distro? Tell us why here

Moderators: b1o, jkerr82508

Forum rules
Try to avoid "fanboyism" Spam is strictly forbidden. The general rules apply: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=568
User avatar
dedanna1029
Sound-Berserk
Posts: 8784
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 20:29
Contact:

Re: Arch Linux

Postby dedanna1029 » 06 Jan 2011, 04:48

viking60 wrote:Ok update today needed a pacman update. Everytime i update pacman I have to uninstall pacman-color :f It will be ok in a couple of days I guess so I can reinstall. But that is annoying.

Code: Select all

# pacman -S pacman-color
resolving dependencies...
warning: cannot resolve "pacman=3.4.1", a dependency of "pacman-color"
:: the following package(s) cannot be upgraded due to unresolvable dependencies:
      pacman-color

Do you want to skip the above package(s) for this upgrade? [y/N] y
looking for inter-conflicts...
 there is nothing to do

... It's STILL not there? W.T.F. ...
I'd rather be a free person who fears terrorists, than be a "safe" person who fears the government.
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html

User avatar
viking60
Über-Berserk
Posts: 9351
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 16:34

Re: Arch Linux

Postby viking60 » 06 Jan 2011, 14:06

Patience is a virtue :P It will come :ugeek:
Manjaro 64bit on the main box -Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz and nVidia Corporation GT200b [GeForce GTX 275] (rev a1. + Centos on the server - Arch on the laptop.
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"

User avatar
dedanna1029
Sound-Berserk
Posts: 8784
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 20:29
Contact:

Re: Arch Linux

Postby dedanna1029 » 06 Jan 2011, 16:51

It's there now.

Code: Select all

# pacman -S pacman-color
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...

Targets (1): pacman-color-3.4.2-1 [0.03 MB]

Total Download Size:    0.03 MB
Total Installed Size:   0.10 MB

Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
:: Retrieving packages from archlinuxfr...
 pacman-color-3.4.2...    28.7K   41.0K/s 00:00:01 [######################] 100%
checking package integrity...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts                  [######################] 100%
(1/1) installing pacman-color                      [######################] 100%

I'm so glad - don't have time to be patient. But then I updated last night, and in that there was an update for pacman-contrib. Wondering if that had something to do with it, as pacman-color is at the same version it was.
I'd rather be a free person who fears terrorists, than be a "safe" person who fears the government.
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html

User avatar
viking60
Über-Berserk
Posts: 9351
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 16:34

Re: Arch Linux

Postby viking60 » 06 Jan 2011, 17:29

I assume pacman-color did not need to be changed so they just had to adjust the dependency.
Manjaro 64bit on the main box -Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz and nVidia Corporation GT200b [GeForce GTX 275] (rev a1. + Centos on the server - Arch on the laptop.
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"

User avatar
dedanna1029
Sound-Berserk
Posts: 8784
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 20:29
Contact:

Re: Arch Linux

Postby dedanna1029 » 06 Jan 2011, 17:33

Exactly what I was thinking...
I'd rather be a free person who fears terrorists, than be a "safe" person who fears the government.
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html

User avatar
dedanna1029
Sound-Berserk
Posts: 8784
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 20:29
Contact:

Re: Arch Linux

Postby dedanna1029 » 06 Jan 2011, 17:55

I have just received word on Facebook that we have a successful CLI-only Arch install from c0d3rm0nk3y. He wants to use it for coding... which he loves to do. :)

Maybe we'll even see some package contributions? Hope so.
I'd rather be a free person who fears terrorists, than be a "safe" person who fears the government.
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html

User avatar
c0d3rm0nk3y
Posts: 5
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 02:24
Location: St Paul, MN
Contact:

Re: Arch Linux

Postby c0d3rm0nk3y » 06 Jan 2011, 17:59

lol.. have a few rungs on the ladder to climb before package release.. just need that killer idea.. :)
Impatient yet content.. go figure..

User avatar
dedanna1029
Sound-Berserk
Posts: 8784
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 20:29
Contact:

Re: Arch Linux

Postby dedanna1029 » 06 Jan 2011, 18:05

LOL. You'll get there. :)
I'd rather be a free person who fears terrorists, than be a "safe" person who fears the government.
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html

User avatar
viking60
Über-Berserk
Posts: 9351
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 16:34

Re: Arch Linux

Postby viking60 » 06 Jan 2011, 19:07

:B CLI only is brilliant for servers (ArchServer for example). For ArchLinux I think a nice Gnome installation with Slim is fine.
Manjaro 64bit on the main box -Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz and nVidia Corporation GT200b [GeForce GTX 275] (rev a1. + Centos on the server - Arch on the laptop.
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"

User avatar
viking60
Über-Berserk
Posts: 9351
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 16:34

Re: Arch Linux

Postby viking60 » 08 Jan 2011, 12:41

Wow lots of KDE updates in todays update. No wonder have a look here
The updates come in Arch first - as always.
Manjaro 64bit on the main box -Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz and nVidia Corporation GT200b [GeForce GTX 275] (rev a1. + Centos on the server - Arch on the laptop.
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"

User avatar
dedanna1029
Sound-Berserk
Posts: 8784
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 20:29
Contact:

Re: Arch Linux

Postby dedanna1029 » 09 Jan 2011, 06:11

dedanna1029 wrote:Next stop, what to do with older packages. I don't want to just delete them right straight away, as I may need to downgrade again, but yet I don't want them filling up root. So, I'm doing as I did with Mandriva's Cooker when I ran it, and copying the files from the cache to a folder in /home first:

Code: Select all

:) cp -R /var/cache/pacman/pkg '/home/dedanna/Downloads/pacman packages/11-05-2010'


Then, I will run to empty the cache in /var/cache/pacman/pkg:

Code: Select all

su
password
pacman -Scc


Do NOT run to empty the cache:

Code: Select all

rm -rf /var/cache/pacman/pkg

This will delete files in the cache that pacman needs to run - and you don't want to do that. Just run the command pacman -Scc.

If you need to downgrade a package after it's been moved out of the cache, all you need do is change the folder of where you're installing from, i.e. if I need to downgrade to something that's in the folder I just copied the cache to, for example:

Code: Select all

pacman -U /home/dedanna/Downloads/pacman packages/11-05-2010/pkg/<packagefilename>

I guarantee you it will fly.

Immediately following the KDE upgrade today:

Code: Select all

# df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev                   10M  292K  9.8M   3% /dev
/dev/disk/by-uuid/b8036618-3036-4ec9-b50c-546fcf082db3
                       25G  9.1G   16G  37% /
/dev/sdc1             299G  283G   16G  95% /media/FreeAgent_Drive
shm                   502M  2.2M  500M   1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1              99M   15M   80M  16% /boot
/dev/sda4             127G   99G   28G  78% /home

After copying the files over and running pacman -Scc:

Code: Select all

# df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev                   10M  292K  9.8M   3% /dev
/dev/disk/by-uuid/b8036618-3036-4ec9-b50c-546fcf082db3
                       25G  8.7G   17G  35% /
/dev/sdc1             299G  283G   16G  95% /media/FreeAgent_Drive
shm                   502M  2.2M  500M   1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1              99M   15M   80M  16% /boot
/dev/sda4             127G   99G   28G  78% /home

The upgrade was 896.98 Mbs, in 248 files. I gained back almost a gig in root. :)

However, I am considering removing KDE. As pretty as it is in Arch, I went in to check it out for a bit. It took 5 minutes for me to go running back to Gnome. :P

It's very slow and bulky, and the 15 damn clicks to do one simple thing is unreal. Plus, trying to find how to do anything is a mess. I mean a real mess. One can't just click on something, and expect it to go. I still think they hosed it with the whole plasma deal, among other things for KDE4. Wonder how Arch did with XFCE? I have a hankering to try it again.
I'd rather be a free person who fears terrorists, than be a "safe" person who fears the government.
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html

User avatar
viking60
Über-Berserk
Posts: 9351
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 16:34

Re: Arch Linux

Postby viking60 » 09 Jan 2011, 16:32

I am running both Gnome and KDE with Slim (not Gdm) and both run fairly OK. To get things done I use Gnome too. It simply is more stable and easier (for me) to handle.
Manjaro 64bit on the main box -Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz and nVidia Corporation GT200b [GeForce GTX 275] (rev a1. + Centos on the server - Arch on the laptop.
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"


Return to “Distro talk”